patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Budget Commission Asks for Documentation Before Approving School Administrator Raises

The performance-based increases are worth almost $60,000 over fiscal year 2012 and 2013.

 

Budget commission members did not sign off on performance increases for 14 administrative staffers in the East Providence School Department during Thursday's budget commission meeting held at city hall.

Chairman Michael O'Keefe said there needed to be satisfactory documentation to prove that staff members are eligible for the performance-based raises that are stipulated in their contracts. The only records provided to the budget commission was a blank administrator evaluation form that asks supervisors to fill out goals and objectives and success indicators.

Dialogue between Interim Superintendent Edward Daft and O'Keefe became a bit tense after the chairman said he wanted to see the completed forms for every staff member, noting goals should have outlined a year before the final review.

"There needs to be a gap of a year between the two events," O'Keefe said.

According to Charles Tsonos, East Providence School Committee Chairman, the contract increases were approved by former school committee members at the "eleventh hour" of their term. Tsonos and Robert M. Silva, current legal counsel for the school committee, attempted to obtain a temporary restraining right before the last election to give the current school committee influence the contracts but a judge upheld the former committee's decision, Tsonos said.

"Those contracts locked us in for three years," Tsonos said. "It's the city who pays."

Documents provided to the East Providence Budget Commission regarding the performance based raises:

Name Title Present Salary Contractual Salary Effective Feb 2012 Fiscal Impact FY 2012 Fiscal Impact FY 2013
Kelly Aherns Director of Technology $92,791 $96,299 $2,491 $3,508
Diana Clarkin Operations Manager - Special Ed $86,572 $89,948 $2,397 $3,376
Samuel Conklin Network Technician $49,488 $51,345 $1,318 $1,857
Anthony Feola Facilities Supervisor $57,435 $60,019 $1,835 $2,584
Roger Farmer Conflict Resolution Specialist $52,595 $54,961 $1,680 $2,366
Raymond Francis Night Facilities Supervisor $54,961 $57,435 $1,757 $2,474
Steve Fratiello Controller $80,662 $83,888 $2,290 $3,226
Eric Laffey Network Administrator $67,709 $70,757 $2,164 $3,048
Raymond Linneman Director of Transportation $80,662 $83,888 $2,290 $3,226
Kenneth Lopardo Truant Officer $29,693 $30,807 $791 $1,114
Jonathan Maxwell Network Technician $41,912 $44,087 $1,544 $2,175
Elizabeth Salzillo Cirriculum Coordinator $86,572 $89,948 $2,397 $3,376
Marc Thibault Conflict Resolution Specialist $57,435 $60,019 $1,835 $2,584
Rebekah Gendron Supervisor of Technology Instruction $83,888 $83,888
Totals 922,375 $957,289 $24,789 $34,914
Related Topics: Budget Commission and East Providence Schools

Lady Integrity

5:52 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

Can't the Budget Commission FREEZE all salaries for East Providence City and School employees?

Reply

Bruce Zarembka

10:36 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

I don't think freezing wages and salaries for all municipal employees is the answer. Let's face it, the prior school committee stuck it to the taxpayers at the school administration level as they went out pouting over their failure to be re-elected. While there is plenty of blame to go around with past and present school committees this was a final slap in the face.

One additional piece which shows the arrogance of the city's school administration is Daft, showing up with a "blank" evaluation form for the individuals affected. Anyone that has spent time in any sort of management position in the buisiness world knows that performance objectives and individual goals are set up the year prior to an evaluation. What are these goals and objectives? If an employee has truly met some or all, they would be eligible to receive a portion or full increase...however, knowing the hjinx that have gone on in this city over the year's I would be more than willing to bet that these forms will now be completed to show objectives and performance results that show everyone acomplished one-hundred percent. While there are many good employees, no one group of employees in any business all perform at 100%.

Daft has drunk the cool-aid, and has become one other public employee that is trying to stick it to the taxpayers.

Thank you for Mr. O'Keefe and the commission keeping an eye on every aspect of this cities finances. Hopefully they have the power to squash this scam.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arthur Dolloff

3:54 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

I agree Bruce, they are either the problem or the solution.

Bent over Taxpayer

10:59 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Daft should be fired! This is just one example of how inept he is for his position. Can you imagine any evaluations being brought to the table blank and actually expect raises to be given out like candy. You will NEVER fix the East Providence School System with morons running it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

J

12:26 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Having known Daft for a while, I'm really surprised and frankly a bit embarrassed. It is one thing that they don't have a proper evaluation system in place, that can be excused since he's interim and it's a failure from Cirillo and previous Superintendents. However at least go and say that, mea culpa we don't have a proper system in place, going forward here's what's changing. But to go in like he did and fight saying that blank piece of paper with no previously established benchmarks, entitles these people to raises, and argue over it is embarrassing and a complete farce.

Jimmy

12:01 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

With the tough economic times we are still talking about raises. Bent over is correct that this city can not get out of its own way. They should have pay freezes across the board in the city. There is no money people! People are moving from this city in droves because of the poor schools and taxes. Why would anyone want to come here.

Reply

Tax payer

12:32 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Zarembka you family works here!

Reply

Tax payer

12:35 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

sorry missed the R on the word your):

Reply

Gulford Maine

12:52 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Crazy
All these titles, looks like a hospital flow chart. Talk about top heavy management
PS Daft has to go. The guy is way beyond his reach

Reply

taxpayer

2:50 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

These contracts are NUTS!!! The last school committee along with Joe Larissa stuck it to us taxpayers big time!!!
Why is it that there are 2 "conflict resolution officers", both doing the same job but one is $60K+ the other is "only" $55K....and then a TRUANT OFFICER who works only 2 days a week earns $30,000
UNBELIEVABLE

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

1:22 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

A Master's Degree is the reason for the difference in salary. In addition, the two CRS positions are funded through a grant and does not cost the tax payers of East Providence a dime.

Comment_arrow

Arthur Dolloff

4:00 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

There are people working at McDs and BK with Masters , how long do you think you could afford the food if they got paid for their degrees value ????

kattie

3:22 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Its bruce rogers that will save all of us ! T A X P A Y E R ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Reply

Arthur Dolloff

3:51 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

When we are all suffering from a failing economy, increasing taxes, loss of jobs, and shrinking wealth and salaries, the last thing anyone in the city administration should expect is a raise. This issue is obscene. The city faces bankruptcy, and these clowns want a bigger piece of the cake. GET RID OF THEM AND GET SONE HARD WORKING PEOPLE THAT UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF SACRAFICE.

Reply

kettle point

4:25 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

shut up ARTHUR DOLLOFF ! you would give aspirin a headache !!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arthur Dolloff

7:57 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Well KP to give you the best advice I can, take a long walk off a short pier....

kettle point

8:34 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

What's the matter the truth hurts! You have diarrhea of the mouth! blah blah blah.................................................! you ever shut up!

Reply

Arthur Dolloff

3:29 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

No, small minded imbeciles like yourself are the problem with this country, it seems that if required to speak beyond sixth grade skill levels you are hard pressed to have an intelligent discourse on any manner. I will not continue to berate your blabber as I feel it is improper to take advantage of those with diminished capability to communicate in a constructive manner.

Reply

david sullivan

8:27 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Arthur Dolloff is correct. Once again the taxpayer gets thrown under the bus by union leadership and cowardly politicians. With this kind of mismanagement more people will leave and property values will continue to decline making matters even worse.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J

2:10 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

These aren't union contracts, these are administrators. The union teachers took a pay cut while Carcieri gave the administrators a raise and built in raises like this each year for the three years of the contract. These are 'management' contracts, not EPEA, not union.

J

2:11 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

I've got a question, I thought we consolidated IT, so why are we paying IT Technicians and a Network Administrator on the school side?

Reply

Mike Penta

7:32 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

The high school administration needs to be flushed. The uncaring and incompetent principal and CTC director need to be replaced. They're talking raises? Unbelievable!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

J

8:03 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

These raises aren't for school level administrators, it is for central administrators.

Comment_arrow

VLake61

9:35 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Mike, I totally agree with you. They need to go! They are making all the good teachers leave. why, because they don't like them. at the expense of our kids! The teacher who ran the green house.. gone!! What a loss! Come on, I hope this new school committee wakes up and sees whats going on!

SP

2:12 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

And none of the salaries above reflect their longevity payments and other "benefits".

Reply

Arthur Dolloff

4:03 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Further to the insanity in the school department, don't we pay these people to get their degrees on the taxpayers dime so we can pay them more for the same lackluster job performance ????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rumford Resident

8:56 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Pretty sure we paid for Vinhateiros phd

Before he retired with the 6 figure pension

Bet we paid for Izzy Ramos phd

Before he sued for not getting a patronage job......

And then we wonder why we have a budget commission

good 4 u

4:27 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

It just never ends. Do these people ever get embarrassed? How do they show their faces in town.....oh they live in Mass where they send their children to school. When does it stop. We will have to wait for the commission to fix this too just like the libraries. The questions is will the average taxpayer be able to hold on until the commission can fix this broken city.

Reply

4SchoolSuccess

9:51 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Ed Daft doesn't belong in the superintendent's position, He has neither the energy, devotion, mental capacity, common sense, nor vision to succeed in the role. He was thrust into it by a school committee that wanted to "clean house" at the teacher union's direction. Daft has demonstrated his incompetence over the years and should never have been placed in such an important position. Any evaluation system will work fine so long as the organization's leader requires those being evaluated to identify system-improvement objectives at the beginning of the evaluation period and to actually achieve those improvement objectives by the end of the period - then a raise might be in order. From news reports, it appears the school evaluation system is sound. It's just that Daft once again showed his incompetence when he failed to enforce the correct procedure.

Reply

Tom Terrace

3:23 pm on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

According to news reports? What news reports? According to my daughter, some of the best teachers at the high school received bad evaluations because the principal doesn't like them. I had the displeasure of sitting in a meeting with the principal last week and she was totally inept. It's no wonder that the bathrooms are all locked since the principal has no control.

Reply
Comment_arrow

VLake61

9:31 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Tom, yes, that is very true what your daughter said. You have teachers at the high school, dropping like flies, all because of this principal. Also the drop out rate is the highest its ever been. She tells her staff to put down that the kids who drop out will be getting their GED, when if fact she knows their not. That's a staff member who needs to GO!

Bruce Zarembka

12:25 pm on Saturday, July 28, 2012

Tax Payer
I have a Sister-In-Law that is a teachers aid...take a look at the city budget and see how much they get paid...I can tell you not much...and in addition, they are not on salary and only get paid for the hours they work. you should do your homework before making assumptions.

Reply

Bruce Zarembka

12:26 pm on Saturday, July 28, 2012

Haven't heard a bout this issue in quite some time...whatever happened with this...hopefully these raisers were not given...does anyone have an update??

Reply

Leave a comment