patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

East Providence Teacher Layoff Toll Reaches 37

After class scheduling is solidified, administrators will make further adjustments and may hire back some staff members.

 

At Tuesday night's East Providence School Committee meeting, Interim Superintendent Edward Daft reported 37 staff members in total, including a good portion of special education specialists, could be potentially laid off by next September.

Months ago, the committee announced that 24 positions would be eliminated.

"We work with principals, we work with union leadership to try and mitigate the anxiety the stress that people feel when they do get layoffs," Daft said. "We try to keep that number down."

Mary King, finance director for the department, said a projected savings could not be estimated quite yet. Some teachers will be rehired after periods of leave. After class scheduling is solidified, administrators will make further adjustments and may hire back some staff members. She anticipates programs, like foreign languages, will be consolidated. 

Laurie Brown, co-chairman of the East Providence Parent Advisory Committee on Special Education, took to the podium to ask how further layoffs will affect special education services. Daft said he hadn't heard of many complaints at the high school since staff members were laid off months ago. She wanted additional information regarding the layoffs. Daft said a plan was in place to teacher assistants (TAs).

"It's just concerning," she said, regarding special education layoffs.

Related Topics: East Providence Schools and East Providence Teacher Layoffs

Veteran

6:13 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Bring charter schools to EP, lay them all off, all 500. I work 180 days a year, I need a raise, please!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just the Facts

7:29 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

Being a Teacher requires a degree, Right? I think you're a little out of your league on this one Mike. Stick to driveways.....

The Baker

7:09 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

I think his name is Daft not Taft. Not sure but might want to check.

Reply

Concerned parent

7:54 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

His name is Daft not Taft. Laying off any special education would be a devastating to special needs children.

Reply

Abigail Crocker

10:08 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Hi users! Thanks for the correction. I typed the story very late last night.

Reply

Jack

10:34 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Obviously Paul does not have a special needs student. Our special needs student has made remarkable progress since we moved to EP, EP is much better compared to some other districts in this state, and would be a big loss for us.

Reply

Jack

10:42 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

And Paul's solution is to put them on disability... hmm who pays for that? The taxpayer, either way - in school or on disability. At least at school, they are getting an education

Reply

Rumford Resident

1:31 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

We should not forget the benefits that the Bradley Partnership has brought to EP.

EP is lucky to have always had a strong special ed division.

Kids are now lucky to have access to Bradley specialists.

A win/win as Deborah Gist has highlighted.

Thanks Tony, Mario and the prior school committee for making this program available to our kids.

Reply

SP

1:48 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The Bradley student have access to Bradley specialists - not the EP students. They are in the EP schools and EP is paying $41,000. a year for each student to be educated by Bradley in the East Providence Schools. They use several classrooms, cafeteria, gym, nurse and more and in some cases only have 4 -5 students in the classrooms. Not sure if this program is really a win/win.

Reply

Rumford Resident

1:53 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

If you asked the kids in the program and their parents they would say it is a win/win.

I don't think this budget commission would allow for a failed program to continue if it wasnt good for the city and the kids.

Reply

Paul

4:05 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Sometimes, our anger at the unions is misdirected.

It's never good for someone to lose their job, even if we feel that the teachers union (through shell organizations like the Working Families Coalition) stole elections. It's never good for us to belittle fire fighters and the police because their union leaders and their political lackeys negotiated expensive contracts that are now bringing our city to its knees. It's also not the fault of the special needs kids that they are disabled; that should not be cause to deny them an education.

The unions and the politicians have taken much from our City. Don't allow them to take our sense of compassion, and our respect for those who keep us safe and who teach our children.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arthur Dolloff

3:26 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

I do not see the problem as being one of retribution, but the fact that the law and union contracts require this layoff notice. Sure the unions put it to the voters in the last election.
Our compassion can be raised if we can understand what is going on and reconcile if the need is worth the cost.
Eventually compassion is a state of mind and soul, doing what we can to support that need, unfortunately often becomes a victim of whether we can afford to do what is needed. Without the understanding of the issues we are hard pressed to make good decisions on the matter. After we all took a hit at the union hand I think a deeper understanding of the actual issues needs to be presented by the Superintendant for closer examination. After all he works for us!!

Rick

5:36 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Is occupational and physical and speech therapy considered "education"? How much of the school budget is spent on special education covering these "medical" therapies?

Reply

Debbie

8:32 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Paul your such an idiot, it's people like you who are pathetic excuses for human beings!

Reply

Debbie

8:40 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Actually Paul maybe you should go on disability for your stupidity!!!!!!

Reply

Mary

10:36 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Paul is an idiot and obviously has no compassion or regard for people I believe what you are stating is called discrimination

Reply

Abigail Crocker

1:21 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Hi everyone - dialogue is encouraged. These are noteworthy issues. But please keep it clean.

Reply

Arthur Dolloff

3:06 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

I do not wish to make little of the needs for special Ed. As Charlie asked “why does EP seem to have a disproportionately high amount of special Ed students”? I think Jacks comment may shed some insight here. He appears to have moved here partially because the special Ed program here is very good, better than several communities he compared he states.
We spend a lot of school funds on special Ed, and I have yet to see a superintendent’s report mentioned as to how well this money is being spent.
I am not saying we should cut this funding but the taxpayers deserve an explanation in real terms of how a disability is defined and how special the resultant education needs to be. I know every person is precious and deserves the best chances they can get; their training early is very much responsible for their success later.
And the costs to provide that training are very much the right of the taxpayer to understand how that affects them and their city’s future. Come on Daft step up and explain to us what we need to understand about the issue, after all you are the person with the answers !!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JR

5:37 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

And Arthur it is all covered by the IDEA, Federal law!
Cutting is not really an option, the current director of "pupil Personell" (special ed), has cut our numbers from 27% to @21% !!!
There have been reports on our special ed, Bacon and Edge praised the current director for her diligent controlling of the numbers.

Tonya Borello

4:00 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

Our property taxes (taxes in general) continue to rise as people continue to move here because we have such a great special ed department. Many of these folks dont pay taxes because they rent apartments. We need to stop acting as though it's our job to save the world. My house is now on the market and hopefully is sold soon god willing because we can not afford to live in East Providence anymore. When we bought our home we couldn't afford Seekonk, so we settled here and now we are looking in Seekonk because we can no longer afford EP. It's crazy.

Reply

KH Parent

4:14 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

Can someone explain to me what is so good about our special ed dept here in EP? I am not asking to be sarcastic. I am genuinely curious and would like to hear something good about this school system for a change.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JR

5:40 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

Historically EP has always looked at WHAT IS BEST FOR THE CHILD! There are some district that have a reputation of fighting parents, and not looking out for wht is best for the student. These districts rely on parents not fighting back, and those that do win in court...
IT IS EXPENSIVE, but I agree with putting the students needs first.

Leave a comment